Indonesian Economic Law

Faces discuss economic law in Indonesia, such as whether the actual face of economic law in Indonesia? Obviously an issue that is often discussed by many people, both the young and old alike.
Like the fact that we see and hear, the face of economic law in Indonesia is changing, getting worse even weirder.
Why not, such cases we often hear, Indonesian law has changed and even reversed.
As an example the case of chicken thief, thief sandals and other trivial cases more in priority than the larger cases such as cases of corruption that have been booming once in various television channels and print media.
Although it should be in the trivial case prosecute to completion so the law is upheld, but why the other high-profile cases such as the cases of corruption in until thoroughly investigate too?
I do not know what to think by law enforcement, perhaps it is the easiest and best decision for them.

But not just a case of corruption by corrupt officials and thieves plaguing the society case, but other cases that lead to the interest of people management is also increasingly bizarre.
Examples of cases we often hear such difficult jobs such as clearing license enterprises, factories and schools.
Indeed, in some regions imposed restrictions on land clearing businesses and schools, that causes excess (too much) in the region. But the ground reality and the school is fairly little effort. a lot of people of reproductive age who do not find work so well with school age children who are not able to get an education. That is because more and more people, so many jobs and school absence were also affected then it is better if the government took care of distributing land business establishments and schools to the more evenly spread.

It is ironic not permit that could turn out to be difficult in that led to blackmail as experienced by PT. Tower Bersama, one of the companies engaged in construction services.
The company is experiencing barriers for the umpteenth time in the manufacture of building permits BTS tower.
The company felt cheated by the Integrated Licensing Service Office (KPPT) new city district in the manufacture of IMB (Building Permit)
Initially they already feel is complicated by cost issues are considered very burdensome levy employers, they are supposed to pay around Rp. 6 million, but they are required to pay approximately USD 15 million, which is more severe there kontuksi other service companies that are required to pay more than that.

Of cases experienced by the PT.tower, Another well as permitting the establishment of mini-cases in Surabaya known to at least 300 stores and modern well networked community property not yet have an operating license as that put forward by M. Gondut Saragih independent consultant.
Apparently besangkutan business owners who have been trying to take care of licensing in accordance with the appeal from the Department of Trade and Industry (Industry and Trade) Surabaya City Government, but ironically the maintenance process lasts long enough. Despite holding a Building Permit (IMB) and Hinder Ordinatie (Ho), to obtain the business license process to drag on.

Strange is not it? both cases PT. Tower and minimarket business establishment, the management letter of permission impressed lasts long enough even complicated, of the maintenance process, even to levy charges of extortion cases occurred.
Perhaps in the case of the establishment of a mini market is somewhat limited, which could see the construction of mini-lethal small businesses such as cafes and shop owners. But arguably limited mini can be easily constructed even built without building permits.
Strangely they try making mini entrepreneurs building permit, means in fact they are Indonesian citizens is not good?

Well the problem is why the permit process is long and hard?
When viewed from the case of mini-government development why not intend to limit the amount of time in the beginning to tell the business owners or institutions involved in the business development, the restriction of new building program? instead let the minimarket business already built. From the care of one by one minimarket already in possession of a permit is pretty tiring, it is better if made a rule to all prospective owners and agencies who helped establish minimarket minimarket about limiting the amount established in the area for the purpose.
When viewed from the case of PT. Tower-making in difficult for license as implied intention in the form of extortion to the PT and other kontuksi services company.

Of these cases clearly face of economic law in Indonesia has been tarnished, not to mention other cases such as the case of illegal levies that are within the company which has hurt the company's workers.

Such as the following case examples are quoted from metrotvnews.comternyata problems of low wages are often in perguncingkan for this is not due to the inability and unwillingness of the company to pay wages, due to matters outside of bipartite relations workers and employers. One is the high cost of illegal fees to be incurred by the company. "So the company funds that should be allocated for the salaries of the company used to pay bribes to state agencies to ensure the continuity of the course of the company," said Director of the Institute for Development of Economic and Finance Indonesia (INDEF) Enny Sri Hartati, in a discussion titled 'Workers Complaining '"at Cafe Warung Daun, Cikini, Jakarta, Saturday (4/2). Happens to the costs incurred were used to bribe here and there that certainly spend the cash the company itself.

Once again ironic face of economic law in Indonesia, wanted to build a company that can develop the nation and help save the community in seeking livelihood was once again delayed.
How can the chain of poverty in this nation can be stopped when various parktik mafia still exist and are not enforced.



Completion:
Should the law enforcers to punish indiscriminately
and punishment for corruption should also be more severe in comparison thief let alone flip-flops and it was minors
And hope of the various cases that occur can be a good lesson for all government agencies, businesses and communities to be more sensitive to the rampant practice of legal mafia,
As well as a task for the government and the state to enforce the law and prosecute practices that this nation can be changed for the better, but do not be unjust to the truth.